| ACI 104-71 | Preparation of Notation for Concrete |
| ACI 116R-00 | Cement and Concrete Terminology |
| ACI 117-90) | Standard Specifications for Tolerances for |
| Concrete Construction and Materials (ACI 117-90) | |
| ACI 117R-90 | Commentary on Standard Specifications for Tolerances |
| for Concrete Construction and Materials | |
| ACI 121R-98 | Quality Management System for Concrete Construction |
| ACI 209R-92 | Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage, and Temperature Effects |
| in Concrete Structures | |
| ACI 210R-93 | Erosion of Concrete in Hydraulic Structures |
| ACI 213R-87 | Guide for Structural Lightweight |
| Aggregate Concrete | |
| ACI 214-77 | Recommended Practice for Evaluation of Strength |
| Test Results of Concrete (ACI 214-77)* | |
| ACI 215R-74 | Considerations for Design of Concrete Structures |
| Subjected to Fatigue Loading | |
| ACI 216_89 | Guide for Determining the Fire ’ |
| Endurance of Concrete Elements | |
| ACI 221R-96 | Guide for Use of Normal Weight and |
| Heavyweight Aggregates in Concrete | |
| ACI 222R-96 | Corrosion of Metals in Concrete |
| ACI 223-98 | Standard Practice for the Use of Shrinkage- |
| Compensating Concrete | |
| ACI 224R-90 | Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures |
| ACI 225R-99 | Guide to the Selection and Use of Hydraulic Cements |
| ACI 229R-99 | Controlled Low-Strength Materials |
| ACI 233R-95 | Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag as a |
| Cementitious Constituent in Concrete | |
| ACI 234R-96 | Guide for the Use of Silica Fume in Concrete* |
| ACI 301-99 | Specifications for Structural Concrete |
| ACI 301M-99 | Specifications for Structural Concrete |
| ACI 303R-91 | Guide to Cast-In-Place Architectural |
| Concrete Practice | |
| ACI 304R-00 | Guide for Measuring, Mixing, Transporting, |
| and Placing Concrete | |
| ACI 305R-99 | Hot Weather Concreting |
| ACI 306R-88 | Cold Weather Concreting |
| ACI 307-98 | Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete |
| Chimneys (ACI 307-98) | |
| ACI 307R-98 | Commentary on Design and Construction of |
| Reinforced Concrete Chimneys (ACI 307-98) | |
| ACI 308-92 | Standard Practice for Curing Concrete (ACI |
| 308-92)(Reapproved 1997) | |
| ACI 309R-96 | Guide for Consolidation of Concrete |
| ACI 313-97 | Standard Practice for Design and Construction of Concrete Silos |
| and Stacking Tubes for Storing Granular Materials (ACI 313-97) | |
| ACI 313R-97 | Commentary on Standard Practice for Design and Construction |
| of Concrete Silos and Stacking Tubes for Storing Granular | |
| Materials (ACI 313-97) | |
| ACI 315-99 | Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement |
| ACI 315R-94 | Manual of Engineering and Placing |
| Drawings for Reinforced Concrete | |
| Structures (ACI 315R-94) | |
| ACI 318-99 | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318-99) AND | |
| COMMENTARY (ACI 318R-99) | |
| ACI 318M-99 | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318M-99) | |
| AND COMMENTARY (ACI 318RM-99) | |
| ACI318-02 | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318-02) AND | |
| COMMENTARY (ACI 318R-02) | |
| ACI 330R-92 | Guide for Design and Construction of Concrete Parking Lots |
| ACI 332R-84 | Guide to Residential Cast-in-Place Concrete Construction |
| ACI 343R-95 | Analysis and Design of Reinforced |
| Concrete Bridge Structures | |
| ACI 345R-91 | GUIDE FOR CONCRETE HIGHWAY BRIDGE DECK |
| CONSTRUCTION | |
| ACI 346-90 | Standard Specification for Cast-in-Place Nonreinforced Concrete |
| Pipe (ACI 346-90) (Reapproved 1997) | |
| ACI 346R-90 | Recommendations for Cast-in-Place |
| Nonreinforced Concrete Pipe (Reapproved 1997) | |
| ACI 347R-94 | Guide to Formwork for Concrete |
| ACI 349-97 | Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Related |
| Concrete Structures (ACI 349-97) | |
| ACI 349R-97 | Commen t ary on Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Rel a ted |
| Concrete St ructures (ACI 349-97) | |
| ACI 350R-89 | Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures |
| ACI 352R-91 | RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN OF |
| BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS IN MONOLITHIC | |
| REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES | |
| ACI 357R-84 | Guide for the Design and Construction of |
| Fixed Offshore Concrete Structures | |
| ACI 359-92 | Code for Concrete Reactor Vessels |
| and Containments (ACI 359-92) | |
| ACI 360R-92 | Design of Slabs on Grade |
| ACI 363R-92 | State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength Concrete |
| ACI 371R-98 | Guide for the Analysis, Design, and Construction of |
| Concrete-Pedestal Water Towers | |
| ACI 372R-00 | Design and Construction of Circular Wire- and Strand- |
| Wrapped Prestressed-Concrete Structures | |
| ACI 373R-97 | Design and Construction of Circular |
| Prestressed Concrete Structures with | |
| Circumferential Tendons | |
| ACI 435R-95 | Control of Deflection in Concrete Structures |
| ACI 437R-91 | Strength Evaluation of |
| Existing Concrete Buildings | |
| ACI 440R-96 | State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) |
| Reinforcement for Concrete Structures | |
| ACI 441R-96 | High-Strength Concrete Columns: |
| State of the Art | |
| 445R_99 | RECENT APPROACHES TO SHEAR DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE |
| ACI 503R-93 | USE OF EPOXY COMPOUNDS WITH CONCRETE |
| ACI 504R-90 | Guide to Sealing Joints in Concrete strucutres |
| ACI 506R-90 | Guide to Shotcrete |
| ACI 524R-93 | Guide to Portland Cement Plastering |
| ACI 530-99 | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR MASONRY DESIGN |
| ACI 530R-99 | COMMENTRY ON BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR MASONRY DESIGN |
| ACI 533R-93 | Guide for Precast Concrete Wall Panels |
| ACI 543R-00 | Design, Manufacture, and Installation Concrete Piles |
| ACI 546R-96 | Concrete Repair Guide |
| ACI 547R-79 | Refractory Concrete: Abstract of State-of-the-Art Report |
| ACI 549R-97 | State-of-the-Art Report on Ferrocement |
| ACI 550R-96 | Design Recommendations for Precast Concrete Structures |
| ACI 551 R-92 | TILT-UP CONCRETE STRUCTURES |
| ACI 124.1 R-92 | BAHA’I HOUSE OF WORSHIP |
| ACI 124.2R-94 | THE MERCER MILE BUILDINGS |
| ACI 126.3R-99 | Guide to Recommended Format for Concrete in |
| Materials Property Database | |
| ACI 201.1 R-92 | Guide for Making a Condition Survey (Reapproved 1997) |
| ACI 201.2R-92 | Guide to Durable Concrete |
| ACI 207.1R-96 | Mass Concrete |
| ACI 207.2R-95 | Effect of Restraint, Volume Change, and Reinforcement on |
| Cracking of Mass Concrete | |
| ACI 207.3R-94 | Practices for Evaluation of Concrete in Existing Massive Structures |
| for Service Conditions | |
| ACI 207.4R-93 | Cooling and Insulating Systems for Mass Concrete |
| ACI 207.5R-99 | Roller-Compacted Mass Concrete |
| ACI 210.1 R-94 | Compendium of Case Histories on Repair of |
| Erosion-Damaged Concrete in Hydraulic Structures | |
| ACI 211.1-91) | Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal |
| Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete (ACI 211.1-91) Reapproved 1997 | |
| ACI 211.2-98 | Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for |
| Structural Lightweight Concrete (ACI 211.2-98) | |
| ACI 211.3R-97 | Guide for Selecting Proportions for No-Slump Concrete |
| ACI 211.4R-93 | Guide for Selecting Proportions for High-Strength Concrete with |
| Portland Cement and Fly Ash | |
| ACI 211.5R-96 | Guide for Submittal of Concrete Proportions |
| ACI 212.3R-91 | Chemical Admixtures for Concrete |
| ACI 212.4R-93 | Guide for the Use of High-Range Water-Reducing Admixtures |
| (Superplasticizers) in Concrete | |
| ACI 214.3R-88 | Simplified Version of the Recommended Practice for |
| Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete | |
| ACI 216.1-97 / | Standard Method for Determining Fire |
| TMS 0216.1-97 | Resistance of Concrete and Masonry |
| Construction Assemblies | |
| ACI 221.1R-98 | State-of-the-Art Report on Alkali-Aggregate Reactivity |
| ACI 222.1-96 | Provisional Standard Test Method for Water-Soluble Chloride |
| Available for Corrosion of Embedded Steel in Mortar and Concrete | |
| Using the Soxhlet Extractor | |
| ACI 224.1R-93 | Causes, Evaluation and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures |
| ACI 224.2R-92 | Cracking of Concrete Members in Direct Tension |
| ACI 224.3R-95 | Joints in Concrete Construction |
| ACI 228.1R-95 | In-Place Methods to Estimate Concrete Strength |
| ACI 228.2R-98 | Nondestructive Test Methods for Evaluation of |
| Concrete in Structures | |
| ACI 230.1R-90 | State-of-the-Art Report on Soil Cement |
| ACI 232.2R-96 | Use of Fly Ash in Concrete |
| ACI 302.1R-96 | Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction |
Warm Welcome To Civil Engineerz Page
Thursday, 18 April 2013
ACI Codes for Building Construction
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
Structural Analysis & Design Engineering Software
STAAD.Pro allows structural engineers to analyze and design
virtually any type of structure through its flexible modeling
environment, advanced features and fluent data collaboration.
Click Here to Download
- Flexible modeling is provided by a state-of-the-art graphical environment and the design supports over 70 international codes and over 20 U.S. codes in 7 languages.
- An array of advanced structural analysis and design features are included such as nuclear certification for 10CFR Part 50, 10CFR 21, ASME NQA-1-2000, time history and push over analysis and cable (linear and non-linear) analysis.
Click Here to Download
MathCAD 15 full for free
PTC Mathcad 15.0
- Excel Component: leverage data in existing spreadsheets
- Symbolic Algebra: manipulate symbolic and numeric calculations in real time
- 3D Plots: visualize complex datasets, qualitatively and quantitatively
- Collapsible Areas: organize complex data by arranging them in sections that can be hidden
- Performance: solve and process large calculations with 64-bit architectures and multi-threading
Download Mathcad 15 with Crack
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
Auto CAD 2012
Design and shape the world around you with AutoCAD® software, one of the world’s leading 2D and 3D CAD design software tools. Maximize productivity by using powerful tools for design aggregation and documentation, connecting and streamlining your design and documentation workflows. When you use AutoCAD as part of the AutoCAD® Design Suite, you will get all the benefits of AutoCAD 2013, plus additional software to create, capture, connect, and showcase your designs with impact.
Auto CAD All Versions Download
Auto CAD All Versions Download
Monday, 11 February 2013
Orion 15
Orion - Structural concrete building design software
Join thousands of engineers worldwide and benefit from Orion
- Design simple or complex reinforced concrete buildings with speed and ease
- Work with real physical objects such as beams, columns and slabs
- Choose from a range of international codes including British Standards and Eurocodes
- Save time with features such as automated FE and frame analysis
- Quickly assess design alternatives to establish the most cost-effective solution
- Produce clear and concise documentation, including drawings and quantities
- Handle project changes easily and efficiently
- Synchronise with leading BIM platforms such as Autodesk® Revit® Structure
- Kindly go for following link to download
Saturday, 9 February 2013
dam breach condition and downstream inundation
Introduction
This document provides an overview of consequence classification for dams in BritishColumbia. It outlines a rough method for assessing consequence and some key concepts
that require consideration in assessing consequence. If the method provides a clearly
defined consequence classification then a consequence classification can be assigned. If
the results are uncertain, use of the higher possible consequence classification is
appropriate or a more detailed assessment method should be used. For larger structures or
complicated downstream channel conditions more detailed procedures may be required
These guidelines are only intended for consequence of failure classification. They are not adequate for the preparation of inundation mapping for Emergency Preparedness Planning (EPP), or for the assessment of hazards and risk analysis.
Consequence Classification Guide
The BC Dam Safety Regulation - Schedule 1 “Downstream Consequence Classification Guide” outlines a classification guide for all dams in British Columbia. The consequence classification (very high, high, low, or very low) identifies the potential for damage and loss in the unlikely event of a dam failure. The consequence classification is not a reflection on how safe the dam is; thus age and condition of the dam are not reflected in the Consequence classification.
The consequence classification is used to determine the design requirements for a particular dam, with dams of higher downstream consequence having higher design standards. Suggested design requirements for dams falling under the various consequence classifications are identified in the “Dam Safety Guidelines” published by the Canadian Dam Association.
Dam Breach Flood Determination
The flood hydrograph resulting from a dam breach is dependent on many factors. The primary factors are the physical characteristics of the dam, the volume of the reservoir, and the mode of failure. The dam characteristics such as dam geometry, construction materials, and mode of failure; determine the dimensions and timing of breach formation. Breach formation, volume of reservoir storage, and reservoir inflow at the time of failure determine the peak discharge and the shape of the flood hydrograph.
The following sections provide a method for estimating dam breach parameters and peak flow discharges for earthfill dams. Earthfill dams are focused on because the great majority of small dams are earthfill. When estimating concrete gravity dam breach parameters, a complete failure of a discrete number of monoliths is considered. For concrete arch dams a complete dam failure is considered. Breach times for concrete gravity dams generally fall between 0.1 and 0.5 hours and for concrete arch dams they generally fall between instantaneous and 0.1 hours.
Estimation of Dam Breach Parameters
Work by MacDonald and Landridge-Monopolis (MacDonald, 1984) were successful in relating breaching characteristics of earthfill dams to measurable characteristics of the dam and reservoir. Specifically, a relationship exists between the volume of material eroded in the breach and the Breach Formation Factor (BFF):
BFF = Vw (H)
where:
Vw = Volume of water stored in the reservoir (acre-ft) at the water surface
elevation under consideration
H = Height of water (feet) over the base elevation of the breach
Interpretation of data (MacDonald, 1984) suggests that the estimates of material eroded from earthfill dams may be taken to be:
Vm = 3.75 (BFF)0.77 for Cohesionless Embankment Materials; and
Vm = 2.50 (BFF)0.77 for Erosion Resistant Embankment Materials
where:
Vm = Volume of material in breach (yds3) which is eroded
Using the geometry of the dam and assuming a trapezoidal breach with sideslopes of (Zb:1) the base width of the breach can be computed (MacDonald, 1984) as a function of the eroded volume of material as:
Wb = [27Vm – H2 (CZb + HZbZ3/3)] / [H (C + HZ3/2)]
where:
Wb = Width of breach (feet) at base elevation of breach
C = Crest Width of dam (feet)
Z3 = Z1 + Z2
Z1 = Slope (Z1:1) of upstream face of dam
Z2 = Slope (Z2:1) of downstream face of dam
If the calculated breach width is negative then the reservoir volume is not large enough to fully breach the dam and a partial breach will result. In this case the head of water (H) needs to be adjusted to estimate the breach depth and peak discharge. Maximum breach
widths have historically been limited to breach widths less than 3 times dam height (Fread, 1981). In addition site geometry often limits breach width.
The time of breach development (τ) in hours, has been related to the volume of eroded material (MacDonald, 1984). Interpretation of data suggests that the time for breach development can be estimated by:
τ = 0.028 Vm0.36 for Cohesionless Embankment Materials; and
τ = 0.042 Vm0.36 for Erosion Resistant Embankment Materials
There is a large uncertainty in the eyewitness accounts for many of these failures; thus these equations may tend to overestimate breach times. In addition, these equations appear to produce unrealistically short breach development times in the case of small dams. A lower limit for the breach development time of perhaps 10 minutes for dams constructed of cohesionless materials and 15 minutes for dams constructed of erosion resistant materials seems reasonable.
Due to the uncertainties in breach development parameters, a range of values should be used to assess the computed dam break flood peak discharges. There is a range of alternative procedures for estimating dam break parameters. An example is the computer program BREACH, developed by Fread (1987) which is used for larger complex dams.
Estimation of Dam Breach Peak Discharge
A number of computer programs, such as DAMBRK (Fread, 1988), have been developed for estimating dam break peak discharge. This computer model, and others, utilises unsteady flow conditions in combination with user selected breach parameters to compute the breach flood hydrograph.
Fread (1981) gives an alternative method suitable for many planning purposes. He developed an empirical equation based on numerous simulations with the DAMBRK model. Estimation of the peak discharge from a dam breach is computed as:
Qp = 3.1 W H1.5 [ A / (A + τ H0.5]3
where:
Qp = Dam breach discharge (cfs)
W = Average breach width (feet) W = Wb + ZbH
H = Initial height of water (feet) over the base elevation of the breach
τ = Elapsed time for breach development (hours)
A = 23.4 Sa / W
Sa = Surface area of reservoir (acres) at level corresponding to depth H
The following Tables 1 & 2 contain estimates of dam breach peak flows for overtopping induced failures of earthfill dams based on Fread’s equation. The values used in developing these estimates are presented after the Tables.
Selection of Reservoir Conditions for Breach Analysis
The selected reservoir storage is an important consideration in dam breach analysis. Normally a couple of reservoir conditions, normal pool and maximum storage elevation during floods are considered. For smaller unattended structures usually only the case of dam failure during overtopping needs to be considered. Overtopping could result from a debris blockage, or a beaver dam constructed, in overflow spillway channel.
In evaluating the overtopping dam breach it needs to be remembered that the reservoir storage and head on the dam are greater than for normal pool levels.
Downstream Routing of Dam Breach Flood
As the dam breach flood wave travels downstream there is a reduction in the peak flow. This effect is governed by factors such as:
the channel bedslope,
the cross-sectional area and geometry of the channel and overbank areas,
the roughness of the main channel and overbank,
the existage of storage for floodwaters in off-channel areas, and
the shape of the flood hydrograph.
Small attenuation is associated with:
large reservoir volume,
small confining channel,
steep channel slopes, and
little frictional resistance in channel and overbank areas.
Large attenuation is associated with:
small reservoir volume,
broad floodplain and/or off-channel storage areas,
mild channel slopes, and
large frictional resistance in channel and overbank areas.
There are a number of methods for modelling the attenuation of peak flow as the breach flood wave travels downstream. For consequence classification a simplified procedure based on generalised flood attenuation curves developed by the USBR (1982) is often adequate. The curves presented in Figure 1 should be used conservatively as they utilize generalised solutions to approximate the reduction of flood peak discharge with distance downstream of the dam. For example the attenuation would be much smaller for a dam breach flow travelling down a steep narrow valley.
Downstream Hazard Classification
Once the dam breach flood inundation path has been determined, the resulting consequence of failure classification can be determined. For BC, the classification system is outlined in Schedule 1 “Downstream Consequence Classification Guide” of the British Columbia Dam Safety Regulation. Refer to the Regulation for Schedule 1. The highest consequence rating in one of the three categories; loss of life, economic and social loss, and environmental and cultural losses is the consequence rating for the dam.
In estimating loss of life in a dam breach one needs to consider:
Time of day of failure
Number of homes in inundation area
Flood depth and velocity
3 people per home (USBR, 1988)
Highways
Recreation
Warning time
Sources of uncertainty
For further information on this topic the “Downstream Hazard Classification Guidelines” produced by the US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR, 1988) are a good starting point.
Other Considerations
There are many other factors that can influence the consequence of failure classification. They include:
Debris build-up and sediment transport can increase floodwave size and its destructive power,
Channel avulsions especially on alluvial fans,
Multiple dams on a river system, and
Current and potential future downstream development,
Warning systems can be effective in reducing loss of life in the event of a dam failure. Thus they are effective risk management tools, however they do not change the consequence of failure classification.
Thursday, 7 February 2013
Concrete Mix Design Work Sheet
Concrete
Concrete is an intimate mixture of:Cement,
Sand (Fine Aggregate),
Coarse Aggregate,
Water.
New Generation Concrete needs use of Special
Materials in addition to above i.e. “ADMIXTURES”
Admixtures may be Mineral or Chemical
Admixtures
Versatility of making concrete with locally
available materials, ease in molding it
into any shape and size and economy in
its making has made concrete the 2nd
largest consumed material on earth!!
Requirements of Good Concrete
A good concrete should:meet the strength requirements as
measured by compressive strength,
fulfill durability requirements to resist the
environment in which the structure is
expected to serve,
be mixed, transported and compacted as
efficiently as possible and
will be as economical as possible
Concrete Durability
“Durability of concrete is the ability of concreteto withstand the harmful effects of
environment to which it will be subjected to,
during its service life, without undergoing into
deterioration beyond acceptable limits”.
Durability can be assured keeping in view the
environment exposure of structure, certain
minimum cement binder content, max limit on
w/c ratio and a certain minimum grade of
concrete for that particular exposure.
Making Durable Concrete
Lowering the porosity and permeability ofconcrete is only way to reduce environmental
attacks on concrete,
Dense and compact concrete that prevents the
ingress of harmful elements is the key to
“DURABLE CONCRETE”.
![]() |
| Concrete Mix Design Plant |
Making Good Concrete
Making good concrete involves:Good quality raw materials,
Proportioning of materials,
Mixing,
Transporting,
Placing,
Compacting,
Curing.
Following is the Excel Sheet for Design Mix of Concrete.
Tile Drainage /Sub Surface Drainage System
Tile drainage
(in agriculture) is an agriculture practice that removes excess water from soil subsurface. Whereas irrigation is the practice of adding additional water when the soil is naturally too dry, drainage brings soil moisture levels down for optimal crop growth. While surface water can be drained via pumping and/or open ditches, tile drainage is often the best recourse for subsurface water. Too much subsurface water can be counterproductive to agriculture by preventing root development, and inhibiting the growth of crops. Too much water also can limit access to the land, particularly by farm machinery
(in agriculture) is an agriculture practice that removes excess water from soil subsurface. Whereas irrigation is the practice of adding additional water when the soil is naturally too dry, drainage brings soil moisture levels down for optimal crop growth. While surface water can be drained via pumping and/or open ditches, tile drainage is often the best recourse for subsurface water. Too much subsurface water can be counterproductive to agriculture by preventing root development, and inhibiting the growth of crops. Too much water also can limit access to the land, particularly by farm machinery
![]() |
| Sub Surface/ Tile Drainage System |
Software for Tile Drainage/ Sub-Surface Drainage to determine Drain Spacing
An approach of Darcy law by using the Energy Equation
approach to find the drain spacing following are the best software to determine drain spacing
kindly give your comments...... for better services...
Profile Plotter for Irrigation Canals & Drains
Profile Plotter for Irrigation Canals & Drains
Dear engineers,
I am here uploading a free Profile/ L-Section Plotter. in which you just put Dta in excel sheet it will Automatically plot in AutoCad Format.
it is prepared An AutoCad Expert here in Sindh Pakistan
Kindly Click Below Link for this Useful Software for free
Profile Plotter Download
Method For Using
Download Longitudnal or Profile plotter from above link
extract it and save it as desktop then you can move the folder/draive of your choice
open excel file named as "sample.xls.
put the required date in concerned coloumn as bed level, water level, berm level, inspection path leve etc
now copy column Q and paste it in notpad and save it as "profile.scr" at desktop.
now open the profile.dwg file in autocad 2007 or 2004
now type scr in command bar open the profile.scr from desk top now it will create automatic profile....
Enjoy....
ETABS 9.7.4 (FULL VERSION)
ETABS 9.7.4 (FULL VERSION)
For nearly 30 years, ETABS has been recognized as the industry standard for Building Analysis and Design Software. Today, continuing in the same tradition, ETABS has evolved into a completely integrated building analysis and design environment. The system built around a physical object based graphical user interface, powered by targeted new special purpose algorithms for analysis and design, with interfaces for drafting and manufacturing, is redefining standards of integration, productivity and technical innovation.
The integrated model can include moment resisting frames, braced frames, staggered truss systems, frames with reduced beam sections or side plates, rigid and flexible floors, sloped roofs, ramps and parking structures, mezzanine floors, multiple tower buildings and stepped diaphragm systems with complex concrete, composite or steel joist floor framing systems. Solutions to complex problems such as panel zone deformations, diaphragm shear stresses, and construction sequence loading are now at your fingertips.
ETABS is the solution, whether you are designing a simple 2D frame or performing a dynamic analysis of a complex high-rise that utilizes non-linear dampers for inter-story drift control.
http://www.eng-syria.net/software/etabs/ETABSv973StandAlone.part1.rar
http://www.eng-syria.net/software/etabs/ETABSv973StandAlone.part2.rar
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:ab60269f72cc627d18c96b8bbe7782dea3c1cbf1&dn=ETABS+9.7&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.ccc.de%3A80
http://www.utorrent.com/downloads/complete/os/win
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








